The final bell is tolling for the Kiev regime. Just a few days ago, the propaganda ministry for the Biden regime announced that funding for their war in Ukraine had finally dried up. Despite Biden’s attempts to bribe the GOP by implementing the same racist immigration measures he condemned Trump for, the negotiations have failed. The Republican Party finally met a war it does not like, and Kiev’s lifeline has been severed.
The situation has become so dire that the regime’s grim reaper, Anthony Blinken, has told Ukraine to prepare for a life without American aid. In other words, the Kiev regime is dead on it’s feet. Without the constant flow of NATO aid, they cannot survive long.
Meanwhile, at the fronts, an increasingly desperate Kiev junta has resorted to conscripting old men and the disabled after the “ubermensch” in NATO’s general staff once again fed an entire generation of Ukrainian youth into a meat grinder for the benefit of western capital. The regime has nearly scraped through the bottom of the barrel to make up for all those lost during the failed spring offensive. The situation is further exacerbated by the Ukrainian general staff feeding thousands of soldiers into suicidal PR offensives designed to spur donations rather than win the war.
“We were sitting in the water at night and we were shelled by everything,” the marine, Maksym, said. “My comrades were dying in front of my eyes.”
The NATO planning was so negligent and slipshod that even Ukrainian sources accuse them of planning the operation like the enemy wasn’t there. As it turns out, the NATO general staff is so arrogant from years of massacring innocent civilians that they have simply forgotten the enemy can fight back. To wit, the best strategy NATO’s generals could devise to penetrate Russian minefields was to drive around them. Over 160,000 Ukrainians died due to NATO’s strategies, with many more permanently maimed or traumatized.
The sad reality is that their deaths were in vain and made no difference in the cardinal situation of the war. Every one of them could still be alive today if not for NATO deciding peace wasn’t in their interests.
The plan was so bad that we must question if it was intentional. After all, a broken and desperate Ukraine is much easier to loot. Just like in the 1990s, western capital is having an absolute field day buying up the shattered remains of Ukraine for pennies on the dollar. Adding to the misery, the country faces a looming demographic crisis. Over 6.2 million Ukrainians have already fled the country and are unlikely to return, a number which represents around 14% of the nation’s pre-war population.
These refugees already face widespread exploitation, with crimes like robbery, human trafficking, rape and more reaching epidemic levels. Those who survive this find themselves with increasingly bleak economic prospects in countries that are more interested in cheap labor than human rights. Even for those who have stayed, the outlook is not much better.
The only industry which has grown in Ukraine during the war is prostitution, continuing a long trend of the exploitation of women started the day they were “freed” from Soviet “repression” by the same NATO politicians and businessmen who later raped them on airplanes and private islands. The ravenous appetites of the capitalist system cannot help but turn their suffering into profits for the ruling class. Far from building a Ukrainian nation, the nationalists in Kiev and their backers in Washington have done nothing but destroy the nation that was already built.
While the war is winding down, the suffering of the Ukrainian people is far from over. Nearly a decade of civil war has poisoned their land with land mines, depleted uranium, cluster munitions and much more. This is a particularly serious problem in Ukraine, where the legendary fertile black soil has provided a living for generations of farmers. Now, thanks to their “friends” in NATO, Ukrainians will harvest only sorrow. The best case scenario is that the previously self-sufficient Ukraine will be dependent on usurious western aid for generations, giving western predators yet another cudgel to wield against the Ukrainian people.
These weapons have caused immense suffering during America’s genocidal wars in the Middle East, and they will inevitably do the same in Ukraine. As I have previously mentioned in other articles, depleted Uranium is so lethal that the rate of cancer in Fallujah, Iraq is orders of magnitudes higher than post-war Hiroshima. Thanks to the rash and suicidal decisions of their leaders, generations of Ukrainian people will pay for NATO’s “support” with their lives.
How did we get to this point? Only a few months ago, the western propagandists were pretending that a Ukrainian victory was imminent and were already planning their beach parties in Sevastopol. Now, even they are forced to admit that the end is near. Despite the NATO propaganda engine still running at full speed, it is not difficult to read between the lines to see where things went wrong.
The enemies of peace
“They were ready to end the war if we took – as Finland once did – neutrality and made commitments that we would not join NATO. This was the key point,”-David Arahamiya, leader of the “Servant of the People” party
Perhaps the most telling piece of evidence was the revelation that Russia had a generous peace deal on the table. Russia was willing to immediately withdraw it’s troops in exchange for Ukrainian neutrality. They demanded no territorial concessions, no changes in Ukraine’s government or economy and no disarmament. The deal was simple, abandon NATO membership and declare Ukraine permanently neutral in exchange for peace.
Had they taken this deal, an entire generation of Ukrainians and the country they lived in would have been spared. Sadly, Boris Johnson arrived in Kiev at the last moment to spike the deal on behalf of NATO, driving the final nails in the coffin of the already fantastical idea of Ukrainian sovereignty. From that moment on, the Ukrainian people bled and died for NATO’s geopolitical aims rather than their own.
As is usual, these facts contradict the narrative put forward by the “rules based international order.” Despite indisputable proof to the contrary, Tony Blinken insists that Putin’s goal was to “wipe Ukraine off the map.” While it would be more shocking to see Blinken tell the truth as opposed to his usual lies, it is disappointing that a cowed and servile “media” simply allows Blinken to launder his propaganda without question.
The disposition of Russian forces clearly shows that Putin’s goal was always to force negotiations from the regime, rather than destroy or conquer all of Ukraine. The initial invasion was carried out by a force that did not exceed 190,000 soldiers. While this is a significant force, it is nowhere near enough to conquer or occupy a large nation of 44 million like Ukraine. No one would be more aware of this fact than the Russian general staff, as their ancestors have already done it before.
On Christmas Eve of 1943, the Red Army (which had over 7 million Ukrainian soldiers) launched the Dnieper-Carpathian offensive which would eventually liberate most of Ukraine from Nazi occupation. During this, the Red Army had a force of over 2 million soldiers in the initial phase, with millions more in following echelons. The Third Ukrainian Front, commanded by Ukrainian-born Marshall Rodion Malinovsky, was over 400,000 soldiers by itself. This was only one of four field armies involved in the liberation of Ukraine.
Modern technology has made soldiers more lethal, but it has done nothing to help them occupy land. 190,000 soldiers would not even be enough to take Kiev or Kharkov. When Kiev was liberated in 1943, Marshall Nikolai Vatutin’s 1st Ukrainian front numbered over 700,000 men. The force which liberated Kharkov was over 350,000.
Even a basic analysis of history can show us that the Russian force of 190,000 was designed not to take Ukraine, but rather to intimidate it’s government into a negotiated settlement. This plan would have succeeded if not for the descendants of the same people who conquered Ukraine in the 1940s deciding once again that war was good for business.
We do not yet know the endgame for this war, but as the Ukrainian regime rapidly crumbles and the Russian Army pushes forward on all fronts, it is simply impossible to imagine Ukraine ever getting such a generous offer again. Whatever fate awaits Ukraine, it now involves major concessions and the occupation of their former territory, with rumors emerging that the Russian forces may even take Odessa, thereby leaving the Ukrainian rump state permanently landlocked.
Now as twilight fades into darkness for the Banderite project, the question we should ask is who benefited from this cruel national experiment? The answer is not the Ukrainian people, who were forced to flee their homes, watch their cities burn, and die like dogs in sodden trenches on suicidal missions.
No, the Ukrainian people will never see the benefit of all this sacrifice. Just like before, the only ones who will gain from the destruction of Ukraine and it’s people are the vampiric western bankers and politicians, eager to once again whet their jaws with the blood of Ukraine.