The New Man: Part 1

How the Zionists created a new type of person to justify the extermination of another

To promote a homogeneous collective in modern times, it was necessary to provide, among other things, a long narrative suggesting a connection in time and space between the fathers and the "forefathers" of all the members of the present community. Since such a close connection, supposedly pulsing within the body of the nation, has never actually existed in any society, the agents of memory worked hard to invent it. With the help of archaeologists, historians, and anthropologists, a variety of findings were collected. These were subjected to major cosmetic improvements carried out by essayists, journalists, and the authors of historical novels. From this surgically improved past emerged the proud and handsome portrait of the nation.-Shlomo Sand “The Invention of The Jewish People”

Like all other forms of fascism, Zionism aims to create more than just a new state. It must also create a New Man to live in this new land.

This is not uncommon among national projects, in fact a great many countries seek to create a new “ethnos”, the devil is in the details. Despite what the Zionists would have us believe, the occupied land of Palestine is actually very diverse. Over millennia of human settlement, it has been the home of countless peoples and even today many of their descendants remain. Far from the binary of Jews and Arabs, the land is host to dozens of people-groups, many of which are small and seriously threatened with cultural extinction. Ancient sects such as the Samaritans have kept their traditions alive over thousands of years of persecution, a fact which should give them common cause with the Jews.

A group of Samaritans celebrating Passover. Source: Wikimedia

Rather than taking these diverse people and trying to unify them together under a common cause, the Zionists instead seek to create an ethnostate that serves only one group, the Jews. This means that “Israel” is not a state of it’s citizens, only a state of the Jews.

If Israel was a state of it’s citizens, then the Ashkenazi minority would be sitting on the sidelines of power, rather than dominating the state as they intended. Therefore, according to it’s own laws, the so-called nation of “Israel” is not a state of it’s citizens, but rather a state of the Jews.

Even besides the obvious implications, this system of apartheid creates creates more questions than answers. In order to impose this system on a nation, we must first understand just who are the Jews? Is Judaism merely a religion or a race? Does a convert change race? What about their children? Why does this one religion and no other have an inherited component?

The Zionist entity insists on an ethnic definition of Judaism in order to create the necessary link between the Jews of today and the Judeans of antiquity. This link is vital to them, the bedrock of their entire project is indigeneity, the idea that Jews are the ancient inhabitants of the land, finally returned to their stolen homes. Without this, Zionism would be seen as what it is: nothing more than a form of fascism tailored for the material conditions of Ashkenazi jews and a doctrine which goes against the tenets of Judaism.

Israel must not [seek to] rise up over the wall; that the Holy One Blessed Be He adjured Israel not to rise up against the nations of the world; that Holy One Blessed Be He adjured the idolaters not to enslave Israel overmuch"- Tractate Ketubot no: 110b

Of course, like everything else about Zionism, this concept of indigeneity is a lie. We cannot say that the Jews are native to Palestine for the simple reason that we cannot say there is such a thing as THE Jews. The so-called State of “Israel” neither represents nor speaks for all the world’s Jews. Judaism has always been a diverse religion which spread throughout the world even before their expulsion from Jerusalem by the Romans.

As a religion which has always accepted converts by force or otherwise, it long ago grew out of representing only one tribe. Therefore, the Ashkenazi Jews who run the apartheid regime today have about as much connection to the ancient Judeans as Christians have to Peter or Muslims to Muhammad.

In order to lay to rest the Zionist narrative, it is necessary to analyze history to find the falsehoods which sit at it’s foundations. From there, the entire ideology will come tumbling down.

The Exodus That Wasn’t

The local population in Palestine is racially more closely related to the Jews than to any other people, even among the Semitic ones. It is quite probable that the fellahin in Palestine are direct descendants of the Jewish and Canaanite rural population, with a slight admixture of Arab blood. For it is known that the Arabs, being proud conquerors, mingled very little with the populations in the countries they conquered ... All the tourists and travelers confirm that, except for the Arabic language, it is impossible to distinguish between a Sephardic porter and an Arab laborer or fellahin. Hence, the racial difference between the diaspora Jews and the Palestinian fellahin is no more marked than between Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews.  - Ber Borochov

History is fraught in the Zionist entity. Despite, or perhaps because of their tenuous connection to Palestine and it’s millennia of human history, bible studies substitute for history lessons in Zionist schools. The Bible has been nationalized and turned into a history of the Jewish people. The idea that the Jews of today can draw a direct, unbroken line between themselves and the ancient Judeans of Biblical times is of paramount importance to the modern day state.

The tales taught as history in the so-called progressive state are well known to those of us in the West who have studied the Bible; all the Jews lived together in a mighty and prosperous kingdom in the land of Israel which was promised to them by god himself until the destruction of the second temple by the Romans, which led to the expulsion of the Jews and their nearly 2000 year long exodus. According to the Zionists, modern Jews returning to Palestine is therefore an anti-colonial project, setting right thousands of years of misdeeds against the Jews.

“Destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem” by Francesco Hayez, 1867. Source: Wikipedia

The reality is not so simple.

Beyond the fact that it is absurd to punish modern Palestinians for the crimes of ancient Romans, there is the even bigger issue that almost none of this tale actually happened. While the destruction of the Second Temple was real, there was no expulsion of Jews in the aftermath. In fact, Jews launched another uprising known as the Bar Kokhba revolt in 132 CE, nearly 70 years after the destruction of the second temple and in the aftermath of this the Roman government expelled Jewish men from the city of Jerusalem. This was the closest the Romans ever came to an expulsion of Jews.

It would be useful here to mention that what we know as history is never the complete story. In times when literacy was rare and writing was a laborious process, only the rich could afford to have their stories recorded. In reality, the vast majority of human history has been lost, stories of people who never had the tools to mark their existence into the record.

While the expulsion from Jerusalem seemed like the apocalypse for the wealthy and clerical classes with enough money and education to write stories about their mistreatment, most of the people of Judea were simple farmers at the time. The people who tilled the soil and raised sheep were not residents of Jerusalem and they were not affected by this expulsion. The peasant masses simply stayed where they were and continued to live their lives. Prior to the establishment of the state of Israel, this fact was accepted by Zionist historians. To quote Israel Belkind, one of the first and most influential:

The land was abandoned by the upper strata, the scholars, the Torah men, to whom the religion came before the country. Perhaps, too, so did many of the mobile urban people. But the tillers of the soil remained attached to their land."